nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24's run amuck?
From: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen () nielsen net>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:36:37 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Iny my view of the world, 1221 is wholly transited by Exodus: *>i210.9.34.0 209.67.40.13 100 0 3967 1221 4736 i They have lots of AS's behind them, including 9443, 4730, 4736, etc. ARIN: What about people who use AS's that aren't assigned to them? Community: Should one filter these announcements? Exodus: Don't you care?
Exodus does not sell bandwidth to Telstra. That is a 'peer' route. /24s are seen from peers in the Exodus network. (check out the route-server for more information.) thanks Christian
Current thread:
- /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck? Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Alex Rubenstein (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Vijay Gill (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Christian Nielsen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck? Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? James Aldridge (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Josh Richards (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)