nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24's run amuck?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 16:49:22 -0500
On Tue, 06 Feb 2001 13:24:45 PST, Kevin Oberman said:
Community: Should one filter these announcements?Why?
Umm... because if you filter the /24s you will remove 58K of 95K, or some 61%. I'm *sure* that having a routing table 40% of the original size will help the next time you have a BGP flap. Your mileage may vary, depending on the actual amount of improvement obtainable by proper aggregation and/or filtering.
Exodus: Don't you care?Why should they?
Umm.. because urinating in the swimming pool tends to irritate the other people at the pool party? Or because if *everybody* acts that way, you get a Really Dirty swimming pool? -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck? Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Alex Rubenstein (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Vijay Gill (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Christian Nielsen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck? Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Danny McPherson (Feb 24)