nanog mailing list archives

Re: USGS returns to the Internet

From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 20:38:39 -0500 (EST)



On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Patrick Greenwell wrote:

A judge *ordered* the DOI offline. A different judge *allowed* Excite@home
to terminate service against the wishes of the cable companies that
Excite had contracts with. They are indeed two different things.


You are absolutely correct.  IANAL, I defer legal questions to those
people that are.

As an engineer I look at the result: service was disrupted.

Current thread:

USGS returns to the Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 09)
- Re: USGS returns to the Internet David Ulevitch (Dec 09)
- Re: USGS returns to the Internet Alan Hannan (Dec 09)
  - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 09)
    - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Randy Bush (Dec 09)
    - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 09)
    - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Randy Bush (Dec 09)
    - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Patrick Greenwell (Dec 09)
    - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: USGS returns to the Internet David Lesher (Dec 09)
  - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Patrick Greenwell (Dec 09)
    - Re: USGS returns to the Internet David Lesher (Dec 09)
    - Re: USGS returns to the Internet Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
    - Network security: The auditors point of view Sean Donelan (Dec 09)
    - Re: Network security: The auditors point of view Patrick Greenwell (Dec 09)
    - Re: Network security: The auditors point of view Richard Forno (Dec 10)
- Re: USGS returns to the Internet jloiacon (Dec 10)