nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Henry Yen <henry () AegisInfoSys com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:19:28 -0400
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 06:04:19AM -0400, Daniel Golding wrote:
Leo is exactly right. The real reasons that folks multihome are: 1) Backbone and/or routing instability striking one upstream provider 2) Local loop/fiber cuts That's pretty much it.
how about, 3) The desire to have the customers of backbone providers with rather different customer bases be able to efficiently reach a target site? (example: a US provider with lots of business customers, a dial-up/DSL concentrator, and a European provider with lots os EU customers; you might choose to buy transit from all three) -- Henry Yen Aegis Information Systems, Inc. Senior Systems Programmer Hicksville, New York
Current thread:
- RE: multi-homing fixes, (continued)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Mark Radabaugh (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes John Fraizer (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Clayton Fiske (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Henry Yen (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes jmalcolm (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Alex Bligh (Aug 24)