nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Vijay Gill <vgill () vijaygill com>
Date: 24 Aug 2001 02:07:35 +0000
"Joel Baker" <lucifer () lightbearer com> writes:
Or by SCTP - an elegant, protocol-level solution to most of the basic reasons for small businesses (IE, those not likely to qualify for a provider-independant block) to want multihoming. Unfortunately, it appears to be even more poorly adopted than IPv6 so far,
The fatal sentence. To forestall ratholing on this list, I urge people to take this to the rathole-by-charter: multi6 http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/multi6-charter.html /vijay "bring the noise" gill
Current thread:
- multi-homing fixes Irwin Lazar (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: multi-homing fixes Roeland Meyer (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Daniel Hagerty (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Daniel Hagerty (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes John Fraizer (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joe Abley (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 23)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Daniel Golding (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Daniel Golding (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes bmanning (Aug 24)