nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Vijay Gill <vgill () vijaygill com>
Date: 23 Aug 2001 23:20:48 +0000
Daniel Hagerty <hag () linnaean org> writes:
Please don't confuse "I need more than one pipe into the internet" with "my organization must place its prefixes into the default free zone". It is possible to effectively use multiple pipes into many ISPs without the cost to all of us that introducing your prefix into the DFZ has.
I am all ears as to how you propose I achieve provider independence without introducing my prefix(es) into the DFZ. eg, say I am connected to two upstreams, I would like to still continue reachability with the global net in case of failure of one of the upstreams (as wide failure), or a failure of an upstream POP (which happens to be the only one in my LATA) from one of the providers. /vijay
Current thread:
- multi-homing fixes Irwin Lazar (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: multi-homing fixes Roeland Meyer (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Daniel Hagerty (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Daniel Hagerty (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes John Fraizer (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joe Abley (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 23)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Daniel Golding (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)