nanog mailing list archives
Re: MicroSoft amplification?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:49:56 -0400
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 16:26:55 PDT, Tony Rall <trall () almaden ibm com> said:
echo). This probably makes PMTUD work a lot better, but it sucks for ICMP
Or totally horques it up entirely if the actual data path used has a different PMTU. No way this will work if 9 paths are clean and one requires a frag. ;) I won't discuss what to do if you get back 10 FRAG NEEDED packets, with differing frag sizes ;) /Valdis
Current thread:
- MicroSoft amplification? Brandon Ross (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Tony Rall (Aug 01)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Adam Korab (Aug 01)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 01)
- RE: MicroSoft amplification? Mike Batchelor (Aug 02)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 01)
- RE: MicroSoft amplification? Rishi Singh (Aug 01)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Tony Rall (Aug 01)
- RE: MicroSoft amplification? Tony Hain (Aug 02)