nanog mailing list archives
Re: MicroSoft amplification?
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 20:18:23 -0400
In message <OF3DD9155A.FA5F9232-ON88256A9B.00804F54 () almaden ibm com>, "Tony Ral l" writes:
I see it too, on that address and on the second of the 3 addresses mapped to www.microsoft.com (the third address doesn't respond at all). Most likely this is due to a not very smart load distribution system.
I'm told that that is indeed the case. Well, strike the "not very smart" part -- I wasn't told that -- but I was told that it is indeed because of the load distribution system. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- MicroSoft amplification? Brandon Ross (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Tony Rall (Aug 01)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Adam Korab (Aug 01)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 01)
- RE: MicroSoft amplification? Mike Batchelor (Aug 02)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 01)
- RE: MicroSoft amplification? Rishi Singh (Aug 01)
- Re: MicroSoft amplification? Tony Rall (Aug 01)
- RE: MicroSoft amplification? Tony Hain (Aug 02)