nanog mailing list archives
Re: black hat .cn networks
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Shawn McMahon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:39:56PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:Oh for the love of god, 15 web sites get defaced and it's suddenly worth trying to deny internet access to a billion people?Really; statistically, it'd make more sense to block .com and .net.
or statistically basing the blocks on networks which actually do something once notified. right now it seems to be an average of 25% response (which is pathetic), whereas to .cn sites its around 0% -Dan
Current thread:
- RE: black hat .cn networks, (continued)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Aaron Dewell (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Walter Prue (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Segal, Mark (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Brett Frankenberger (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks George William Herbert (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Roger Marquis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Kevin Day (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Roeland Meyer (Apr 30)