nanog mailing list archives

Re: black hat .cn networks

From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:52:55 -0400

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:39:56PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:


Oh for the love of god, 15 web sites get defaced and it's suddenly worth
trying to deny internet access to a billion people?


Really; statistically, it'd make more sense to block .com and .net.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

RE: black hat .cn networks, (continued)
- - - RE: black hat .cn networks Mike Leber (Apr 30)
    - RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
  - RE: black hat .cn networks Aaron Dewell (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Walter Prue (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Segal, Mark (Apr 30)
  - Re: black hat .cn networks Brett Frankenberger (Apr 30)
  - RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
    - Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks George William Herbert (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 30)
  - Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (Apr 30)
    - Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Roger Marquis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Kevin Day (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Roeland Meyer (Apr 30)