nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Backhoe Summit
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:28:18 -0700
I've come to the conclusion that a lot of these problems could be avoided with a bit of enforced cooperation. Recent ordinances require competing cell providers to licence or share existing towers before new tower permits are allowed. We don't allow multiple rows of telephone poles in the same easement. Why do we allow unconstrained underground work? The rampant "competition" just isn't tenable.
Well, one little issue here.. if everyone shared the same path, that means the backhoes can do more damage with one swing. Yeah, the frequency may be offset by better records, but the impact of each one will be much greater. Its a no-win situation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Bouchard [Immagine Your ] web () typo org [Company Name Here] Network Engineer http://www.typo.org/~web/resume.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: The Backhoe Summit, (continued)
- RE: The Backhoe Summit Sean Donelan (Sep 23)
- RE: The Backhoe Summit John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: The Backhoe Summit Steve Sobol (Sep 23)
- Re: The Backhoe Summit John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: The Backhoe Summit Steve Sobol (Sep 23)
- Re: The Backhoe Summit John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: The Backhoe Summit Steve Sobol (Sep 23)
- RE: The Backhoe Summit John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- RE: The Backhoe Summit Sean Donelan (Sep 23)
- Re: The Backhoe Summit William Allen Simpson (Sep 24)
- Re: The Backhoe Summit Wayne Bouchard (Sep 25)
- RE: The Backhoe Summit Craig Holland (Sep 25)