nanog mailing list archives
RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Aaron Moreau-Cook wrote:
up getting only one /24. Then another upstream provider, quite large, forced another /24 upon us. When we stated we didn't need/want it, they said they could take it back but it was not standard practice; all DS3 customers get a /24. Anyway... Think of all the other companies out there who get treated like this?
Who's forcing address space on customers? It's like pulling teeth to get address space from most of them! --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report, (continued)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Sep 22)
- exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Kai Schlichting (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Vijay Gill (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Jared Mauch (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Vijay Gill (Sep 22)
- exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Kai Schlichting (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Brett L. Hawn (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Timothy Brown (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report J. Scott Marcus (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report William Waites (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Aaron Moreau-Cook (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Sep 22)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Chris Chaundy (Sep 22)