nanog mailing list archives
Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
From: Vijay Gill <vijay () umbc edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:21:43 -0400
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Jared Mauch wrote:
My primary concern is that the current growth is going to outscale the medium sized providers as the one vendor that the above output came from doesn't appear to be providing enough memory in their equipment, or have enough memory options available.
Fortunately, the large ISPs will act as the mine canary for this particular problem. Memory will go up as the big boys start to use their leverage with the vendors. I did some internal presentations on this particular topic at a particularly large ISP.
What would be nice is if someone were to put together an auto-nagger similar to the "your dns server is lame" of the old days messages. Back when the network tables were about 40-45k, I would read the output of "sh ip b" and send messages to people asking them to aggregate, but those days are over... (at least for me..)
The CIDR report does a fairly good job at this. /vijay
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Sep 08)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Sep 15)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Sep 22)
- exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Kai Schlichting (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Vijay Gill (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Jared Mauch (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Vijay Gill (Sep 22)
- exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Kai Schlichting (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Brett L. Hawn (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Timothy Brown (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report J. Scott Marcus (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report William Waites (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Aaron Moreau-Cook (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Chris Chaundy (Sep 22)