nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP liability in caching/decreased caching efficiency
From: bcurnow <bcurnow () sonnet com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
I don't think any one has mentioned this yet, but I think that AOL got a section added to the DMCA that immunizes ISPs/NSPs from the copying that occurs in the operation of the network. AOL, of course, does lots of caching. A content person would have a *very* steep hill to climb in trying to argue that an ISPs decision in how to operate their network is somehow beyond the scope of this immunization. ----------------- Brian Curnow ----------------
Current thread:
- Re: decreased caching efficiency?, (continued)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Christian Kuhtz (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Christian Kuhtz (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? William Allen Simpson (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Ian Cooper (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Dana Hudes (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Christian Kuhtz (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Pim van Riezen (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Daniel Senie (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Greg A. Woods (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP liability in caching/decreased caching efficiency bcurnow (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Marshall Eubanks (Oct 24)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Greg A. Woods (Oct 21)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Simon Leinen (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Lincoln Dale (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Christian Kuhtz (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Greg A. Woods (Oct 20)