nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 16:20:29 -0700
A provider in China has been assigned addresses in the traditional class C space. APNIC's assignment is a /16 for this allocation. Said provider, trying to be good Internet citizens are announcing only aggregates of /16. However, they're running into several providers that are filtering the announcements because they aren't /24.
i can only imagine that these providers are confused by one vendor's (recently fixed) rather baroque filter rule syntax. randy
Current thread:
- BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Jeff Haas (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Daniel Senie (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Jeff Haas (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space John Fraizer (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Michael Hallgren (May 19)
- RE: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Randy Bush (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Jeff Haas (May 22)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Randy Bush (May 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Danny McPherson (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Danny McPherson (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space John Fraizer (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space John Fraizer (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Danny McPherson (May 19)
- Re: BGP filtering of supernets out of classful space Daniel Senie (May 19)