nanog mailing list archives
Re: Here we go again
From: Scott Solmonson <scosol () speedera com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:23:24 -0800
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Eric A. Hall wrote:Tailor your output, too many requests for same page from same address gets a larger proportion of adverts on the page.Or generate redirects back to the original site. hehehI was thinking the exact same thing. The DoS'er would end up DoS'ing themselves. -Dan
Eh? Since when does "same source address" mean "same client"? Ya- start redirecting everyone to an AOL proxy... And all these depend on being able to identify "authentic" users- I don't think that's going to happen- If the client is coded correctly you won't be able to tell at all- -- Scott Solmonson Speedera Networks Inc. -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* scosol () speedera com / 408.970.1591
Current thread:
- Here we go again Henry R. Linneweh (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott McGrath (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Eric A. Hall (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again BrandonButterworth (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Eric A. Hall (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Dan Hollis (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Morris Allen (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Dan Hollis (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Eric A. Hall (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott McGrath (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Marc Slemko (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)