nanog mailing list archives
Re: Here we go again
From: Scott Solmonson <scosol () speedera com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:22:00 -0800
What can you do? I would say "not much"- Assuming you truly cannot separate out the "legitimate" requests- Your choices are left to these: Bleed off all traffic above the POP's allowed levels- Increase capacity- Employ a distributed caching system- That's about it as far as I can see. "Scott McGrath" wrote:
What to we need to do to nip this one in the bud "Henry R. Linneweh" wrote:If this is the case then lets kick butt now before they have a chance to start ?Hactivists? plan DDoS Web attack Electrohippies? software could be as effective as distributed denial of service tools used in last month?s Web attacks. http://www.msnbc.com/news/380065.asp?cp1=1
-- Scott Solmonson Speedera Networks Inc. -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* scosol () speedera com / 408.970.1591
Current thread:
- Here we go again Henry R. Linneweh (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott McGrath (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Eric A. Hall (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again BrandonButterworth (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Eric A. Hall (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Dan Hollis (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Morris Allen (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Dan Hollis (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Eric A. Hall (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott McGrath (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Marc Slemko (Mar 10)
- Re: Here we go again Scott Solmonson (Mar 10)