nanog mailing list archives
Re: FW: public key service
From: ktsolis () mindspring com
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:07:44 -0400
A slight correction.... On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Tsolis, Kristen wrote:
I'm going to try to keep this operational, but it's hard because you're going to find that support for making a robust keyserver network hinges upon people agreeing that such a service is needed, and many PGP users are going to tell you that such a keyserver violates the PGP trust model.
Hm? These words have been misattributed to me. I don't see any reason why the PGP trust model would be compromised by a keyserver network since the individual PGP user is checking keys and deciding which keys to trust. I welcome further conversation re:ISP-run keyservers on the keyserver-folks list, but I hope to see further coordination re: a NANOG keysigning party on this list. cheers, Kristen
Current thread:
- Re: public key service, (continued)
- Re: public key service Patrick Greenwell (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Matt Braun (Jun 26)
- RE: public key service ktsolis (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Joseph Birthisel (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Joshua Goodall (Jun 26)
- Re: FW: public key service Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service bmanning (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service ktsolis (Jun 27)