nanog mailing list archives
Re: public key service
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:41:54 -0400
In message <20000626172646.A1166 () eiv com>, Shawn McMahon writes:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 01:39:49PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:so, thanks to many nanogians, i now have a selection of servers, multi- addressed servers, an ldap server, ... i can try when i need this service. needless to say, i am not impressed. while i guess i can limp along like this, it does not feel like what i would call a production quality service.Randy, no offense, but it sounds like you have some seriously unrealistic expectations here. Exactly how much are you paying for this service? It sounds like you should receive a full refund.
No, Randy has a need -- an operational need that I suspect many on this list share. His note simply says that the current system is inadequate for production use; a more recent note asks, in about these words, "what can he (and other operators) do" to help the situation. --Steve Bellovin
Current thread:
- Re: public key service, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Message not available
- Re: public key service Robert M. Enger (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Shawn McMahon (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Patrick Greenwell (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Joshua Goodall (Jun 26)
- Re: FW: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service bmanning (Jun 27)