nanog mailing list archives

Re: Wanted: Clueful Individual @ TeleGlobe.net


From: "Chris" <chris () bgpconsulting com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:33:40 -0400



----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
To: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Wanted: Clueful Individual @ TeleGlobe.net



At 11:32 AM 7/17/00 -0400, Chris wrote:
 >
 >You have to remeber that most major providers don't have time to mess
with
 >non customers. If you want to get any kind of resolution you need to
send
 >email to there noc and open a ticket with your provider, because that is
who
 >AT&T or TeleGlobe is going to work with. Also by opening a ticket with
your
 >provider you let them clear the return path through there network(which
is
 >almost always diffrent that your path there), and you also don't bug
people
 >on nanog with mail like this.

In other words, "most major providers" do not have time to fix their own
network?

No in other words most people need to get a clue, because(having worked in
the noc of a large provider) most of the time there is no problem or it is a
problem in the return path(and there providers network) and not even on the
provider they are callings network.


If someone called my NOC with a real problem on my network, customer or
not, my NOC *will* fix that problem, or that NOC monkey will be looking
for
another job.  Problems on your network are your problem, whether a
customer
reports them or some random person on the street.  You should be thanking
them for backing up their (failed) internal monitoring system, not telling
them to bugger off.

I am willing to bet you don't have over 5,000 customers like  most BACKBONE
providers do.

Also, suggesting someone get their provider to open a ticket with the
network in question is a bit silly.  This is the North American NETWORK
PROVIDERS' Group - most of the people who post here *ARE* a provider.
(And
are very well aware of asymmetric routing on the Internet.)

Also lets face it most of the people on this list are BUYING transit from a
provider or providers; That makes them customers NOT a backbone provider. If
you notice you don't see Sprint or UUnet, or C&W posting here looking for a
AT&T router person.

Why? When I worked at the noc of a large provider we got and worked tickets
all the time that were not on our network. And I have never had any problems
with Sprint like Sean was talking about. All I had to do is tell them who I
was with and they helped me. (w I didn't work for sprint).

Besides, this does not always help.  As Sean pointed out, some networks
will not open tickets for peers (even though that is in every peering
agreement I have ever seen).

That doesn't mean they will not work with a peer.


 >       Chris

TTFN,
patrick






Current thread: