nanog mailing list archives
Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?
From: Tony Mumm <tonym () netins net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:07:07 -0500
David Charlap <david.charlap () marconi com> wrote
I don't know if this what you were observing, but the MAPS RBL can be used in this capacity. See also: http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/usage.html#BGP Of course, you'd want a different database for blocking script kiddies. -- David
I think that is similar to what you want....and it might be adequate against scanners and other simple hacks. I don't think it would be worth anything against a flood, the flood isn't going to care that it sees nothing coming back from your network. It might discourage someone if they see no ECHO_REPLYs coming back from their 10 Mbit smurf....but it probably wouldn't be long before they just stop caring. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?, (continued)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? J.D. Falk (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Kai Schlichting (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Steve Sobol (Jul 06)
- RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? David Charlap (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Tony Mumm (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Mark Mentovai (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Shawn McMahon (Jul 06)