nanog mailing list archives
Re: CEF Load balancing...
From: Mark Prior <mrp () connect com au>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:54:38 +1030
> It's almost safe to use it, if you can turn off features which cause troubles. > CEF is not trouble-making feature except some configurations. > > Except when the router decides to turn CEF off all by itself due to > malloc failure. That sounds like a memory leak, have you tried the latest versions ? in 12.0(x)S there was a catastrophic memory leak in 12.0(7)S related to cef ... It's more bizarre than that since show memory indicates its got plenty so its either recovering it somehow or confused. I would suggest that later. We're running the latest code, well not quite (only 12.0(8)S rather than 12.0(8.3)S, but we are sick of catastrophic failures and 12.0(8)S seems stable enough, or more exactly we don't need more bug introducing features. Mark.
Current thread:
- CEF Load balancing... Alex Rubenstein (Jan 14)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Jesper Skriver (Jan 14)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... William Allen Simpson (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Jesper Skriver (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Alex Rubenstein (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Wayne Bouchard (Jan 17)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... William Allen Simpson (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Jesper Skriver (Jan 14)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Forrest W. Christian (Jan 16)
- RE: CEF Load balancing... Sykes, Phil (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Neil J. McRae (Jan 17)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Randy Bush (Jan 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CEF Load balancing... Martin, Christian (Jan 17)