nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content
From: Chris Josephes <cjoseph () mr net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:12:09 -0600 (CST)
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Alex Bligh wrote:
I never received any of those mailings. Never ever. Are specific people being targeted?Has anyone virus checked these for worms? I care not, reading email on UNIX, but I suspect that's the cause of it. Possibly some innocent(s) on NANOG has an infected Windows machine that is spewing using an address book built from mails it has received - & you see more than one source as some people have now run the program.
FWIW, I received an email from a Windowz machine spread from a virus a while back. The behavior of the virus and the headers of the message suggested that for every message in the affected user's inbox, the virus would create a new message with the From: and To: headers transposed, and send it back to the originator. So, only people that posted to Nanog would get this from infected machines. -- _______________ Chris Josephes __/ MRNet/Onvoy \ chrisj () mr net __/ www.onvoy.com / \________________/
Current thread:
- Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Alex Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content William Allen Simpson (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Kai Schlichting (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Alex Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Chris Josephes (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Kai Schlichting (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content William Allen Simpson (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Sean Donelan (Jan 14)