nanog mailing list archives
Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content
From: Alex Bligh <amb () gxn net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:33:35 +0000
I *believe* (really hope) this SPAM impersonating a NANOG poster replying to a thread (traceroute doesn't go through pacrim.net). Op content: If so, be prepared for all sorts of being accused of sending all sorts of other exciting messages about lesbians, cookie recipes etc. etc. Alternative explanation: Kai your machine has a really nasty worm virus Alex Bligh GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks) Delivery-date: Fri Jan 14 07:37:50 2000 Return-path: <kai () pac-rim net> Envelope-to: amb () sapphire noc gxn net Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 07:37:50 +0000 Received: from brimstone.global.net.uk ([194.126.80.70] helo=brimstone.noc.gxn.net) by sapphire.noc.gxn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #2) id 1291Is-0000Fa-00 for amb () sapphire noc gxn net; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 07:37:50 +0000 Received: from [168.212.244.134] (helo=mail.gxn.net) by brimstone.noc.gxn.net with smtp (Exim 3.02 #3) id 1291Gi-0004Sb-00 for amb () gxn net; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 07:35:36 +0000 Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01AF0E92.A4E9CDO0" Message-id: <E1291Gi-0004Sb-00 () brimstone noc gxn net> From: Kai Schlichting <kai () pac-rim net> To: amb () gxn net Subject: Re: Eeek - .NU Domains using Ö, Ä, Å, Ü, Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 07:35:36 +0000 1. There are alternative views of the following: (Invoke menu with right button.) View HTML contents with Mosaic 2. Lesbians.exe ---->8--------->8-------->8--------->8-------->8--------->8-------->8-------
Current thread:
- Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Alex Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content William Allen Simpson (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Kai Schlichting (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Alex Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Chris Josephes (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Kai Schlichting (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content William Allen Simpson (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Sean Donelan (Jan 14)