nanog mailing list archives
Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay
From: Richard Irving <rirving () onecall net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:32:27 -0500
WKS RRs weren't doing that - the boundary between host names and service names was still in place; so WKS RRs were simply redundant.
Really, the point is, not enough domains implemented -non-standard- WKS... If you didn't need to -remap- the port, why bother ? And, in case you can answer -that- question: Kerberos locks on WKS didn't actually -work- till -years- later. :}
--vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Randy Bush (Jan 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Vadim Antonov (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Richard Irving (Jan 10)
- RE: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Olivier Gerschel (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Richard Irving (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Joe Abley (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Daniel Senie (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Joe Abley (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Chris Cappuccio (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Andrew Brown (Jan 11)
- Something very odd on an older 2514 . Mr. James W. Laferriere (Jan 10)
- Re: Something very odd on an older 2514 . Chris Cappuccio (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Daniel Senie (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Forrest W. Christian (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Patrick Greenwell (Jan 10)