nanog mailing list archives
RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 01:39:54 -0500 (EST)
Oh, come on. You must not monitor NANOG that much. Otherwise, you would know that if I was flaming, anyone with a bell*.* address would be in a burn ward. I was just making a simple observation. Can I help it if every contact I've had, save one, with bell*.* has been a clueless, old-fart, union-so-you-can't-replace-him-her-with-someone-with-clue, wouldn't know a clue if it came up and bit them in the a$%@^$@%^ piece of %^&#%&^#?!??? who is sucking up oxygen from the script kiddies (who while I hate, may actually grow up some day and do something productive)??!!!??? Don't want to be associated with that stereotype? Get rid of 99% of your organization or go to work for someone else. BTW: I know from first hand experience. I had to leave a job at a bell*.* company because as a 19 y/o. I made the 20/30/40/50/60 y/o's nervous as far as their jobs were concerned. 'Nuff said. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
John, I disagree with Deron, albeit for different reasons. But I don't think the flame was neccessary. Cheers, Chris -- Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net> -wk, <ck () gnu org> -hm Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S. "I speak for myself only."-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of John Fraizer Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 7:01 PM To: Deron J. Ringen Cc: Simon Lyall; nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Deron J. Ringen wrote:-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Simon Lyall Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 3:03 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?. .One of the companies we work with has 192.168 address for some of the radius servers we have to talk to, we are directly connected to them so it's not a big pain but it's just so ugly.. . That makes perfect sense to me...there is not a better way toprotect a boxfrom a DOS/hack than to only give it a private address. Why expose a box to the outside world if there is not a need???Deron, Ever heard of an access list? Didn't think so.Deron J. Ringen Sr. Network Architect BellSouth Internet ServicesTypical. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?, (continued)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Hawkinson (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Dana Hudes (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Jason Lewis (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Bill Woodcock (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Adam Rothschild (Dec 30)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Steve Sobol (Dec 30)