nanog mailing list archives
Re: florida ix(en) facing south
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 10:24:38 -0800
folk clueless enough to put up a shockwave-only page sure ain't gonna get a lot of big isp business.That's marketing folks for ya. Can't hold that against what the NAP can offer.If the website doesn't conform to reasonable standards, then either the company doesn't have technically competant people, or else they aren't able to influence the public website.
bingo!
Current thread:
- florida ix(en) facing south Randy Bush (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Scott Patterson (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Randy Bush (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Scott Patterson (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Bennett Todd (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Scott Patterson (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Randy Bush (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Christian Kuhtz (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Jeff Mcadams (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south David Diaz (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Christian Kuhtz (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Randy Bush (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Chris Adams (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Scott Patterson (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Daniel L. Golding (Dec 22)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Randy Bush (Dec 22)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Leo Bicknell (Dec 24)