nanog mailing list archives
Re: Port scanning legal
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () mail-abuse org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:36:03 -0800
On 12/19/00, Mathew Butler <mbutler () tonbu com> wrote:
Great, so you're suggesting punishing good locksmiths or windowmen.
How do I configure my router to punish locksmiths or windowmen? -- J.D. Falk "The Internet isn't just a publishing medium or a Product Manager medium for commerce, it's a social medium." Mail Abuse Prevention System LLC -- Howard Rheingold
Current thread:
- Re: Port scanning legal, (continued)
- Re: Port scanning legal Andrew Brown (Dec 20)
- RE: Port scanning legal Roeland Meyer (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Mathew Butler (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Jade E. Deane (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Roeland Meyer (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Marius Strom (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Mathew Butler (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal J.D. Falk (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Steve Sobol (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal jlewis (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Christian Kuhtz (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: [OT]Port scanning legal Henry R. Linneweh (Dec 20)
- Re: [OT]Port scanning legal Brian W. (Dec 20)
- Re: [OT]Port scanning legal Henry R. Linneweh (Dec 20)
- Re: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- [OT] Re: Port scanning legal Adam Rothschild (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)