nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () sss1 gwi net>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 14:27:51 -0400
On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:47:50 -0400 Paul Ferguson wrote:
surprised not to see this mentioned on NANOGSent: Friday, March 31, 2000 To: Notify Subject: Exodus Customer Confidential CommunicationGordon, Does the word "confidential" elude you? - paul
Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this position. If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should the press not report it? If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report it? If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it? There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous press is a profound good for society.... regards, fletcher P.S. "Scandal-Monger", Safire, William, 2000
Current thread:
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus, (continued)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Adrian Chadd (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Ulf Zimmermann (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Patrick Greenwell (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Barry Shein (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Ulf Zimmermann (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Shawn McMahon (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Mark Borchers (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Gordon Cook (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Bill Woodcock (Apr 04)