nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 20:34:39 -0700
Because one party -- the originator -- marks an electronic communique as a confidential communication, does that really require the reciever to keep it confidential?Professional courtesy.
or one nanoclue if you think you want anyone to talk to you. randy
Current thread:
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus, (continued)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Forrest W. Christian (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Howard C. Berkowitz (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Simon Lockhart (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Ulf Zimmermann (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Mark Kent (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Charles Sprickman (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Dustin Goodwin (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Michael Shields (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus John Payne (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Adrian Chadd (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Ulf Zimmermann (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Patrick Greenwell (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Barry Shein (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Ulf Zimmermann (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Shawn McMahon (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Mark Borchers (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)