nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Table Question
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowledge com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:04:42 +0100
"This table is generated from objects in the RIPE and RA databases. If there is something missing or wrong then please refer to the original data in the databases. The information given here can apply to peering arrangements between members anywhere in the world, and is not limited to the traffic flowing through the LINX."
When the peering matrix perl script was written (false modesty be damned :), we decided that it was too complicated to bother with anything other than the public information in the RA/RIPE db's. The other though was that if two AS's peer someone else and not at the LINX, then that is their loss, and not one that we should have tried too hard to fix for them. The use of the RA/RIPE db's was seen as the only "neutral" data available, and neutrality was (and I think still is) a priority at the LINX. Peter
Current thread:
- Peering Table Question Jeff Lentz (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question bmanning (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Mike Hughes (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Peter Galbavy (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Mike Hughes (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Jeff Haas (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Peter Galbavy (Apr 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering Table Question Jeff Barrows (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Alex Bligh (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Christian Nielsen (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Joel Jaeggli (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Simon Lockhart (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 19)