nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 22:20:17 -0400
At 10:15 PM 04/03/2000 -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Because one party -- the originator -- marks an electronic communique as a confidential communication, does that really require the reciever to keep it confidential?Professional courtesy.Hmm, I forgot to put the sentence in about 'how it would be ethical for people to honor it.'...
Fortunately, there are still quite a few folks who still honor professional & personal ethics. Unfortunately, there are many who do not. - paul
Current thread:
- peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Gordon Cook (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Alex Rubenstein (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Alex Rubenstein (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Gordon Cook (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Gordon Cook (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Ryan Tucker (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Bill Woodcock (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Alex Rubenstein (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus William Allen Simpson (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Henry R. Linneweh (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Vijay Gill (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)