nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:13:07 -0700
O, wow. Take two broken-as-designed technologies, mix together... :) --vadim
I guess going to IPv6 would be simpler in this case. Or, we can maybe dream of some 'service locator' function tied to inter-domain MPLS tunnels...
again, just food-for-thoughts. jld.
Current thread:
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts), (continued)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) John Todd (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) jeanlou . dupont (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) jeanlou . dupont (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Phillip Vandry (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) jeanlou . dupont (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Dean Anderson (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Vadim Antonov (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 19)