nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () virgin relcom eu net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 23:36:33 +0400 (MSD)
I do not know, but it seems this train is over... It was replaced, for example, by the ability of the http protocol to support a few virtual hosts at the same IP address.
HOST_NAME:SERVICE -> IP_ADDRESS:PORT Now we have a lot of troubles due to this choose.Of course if we could implement RFC2052 everywhere... I wonder if _any_ popular end user software has quietly added forward compatibility with SRV records?
Current thread:
- ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) John Todd (Oct 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) jeanlou . dupont (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) jeanlou . dupont (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Phillip Vandry (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) jeanlou . dupont (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Dean Anderson (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Vadim Antonov (Oct 18)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts) Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 19)