nanog mailing list archives
RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS?
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () Relcom EU net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:47:21 +0400 (MSD)
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Alex P. Rudnev wrote: If you have an OC-48, someone will find a way to Smurf it and then you will need QoS at the ICMP level (CAR?). I believe that no matter how unlimited your b/w will be you will always need some modicum of QoS.
It's just what I am saying - some technologies (as CAR) are used widely, some with the troubles (traffic-shaping, for example), some are dead (RSVP). Through - SMURF by OS-48? Let's the enemy try - OS-48 will not notice it at all. You can't generate such traffic by the simple way. Anyway, no one answer to the initial question. I guess no one here use complex QoS features, except primitive (CAR, RED, WFQ) ones. Alex.
Current thread:
- Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Pete Kruckenberg (May 16)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alan Hannan (May 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Vadim Antonov (May 17)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Steve Riley (MCS) (May 17)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Prabhu Kavi (May 17)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? John Leong (May 17)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Hank Nussbacher (May 17)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alex P. Rudnev (May 19)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Hank Nussbacher (May 19)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alex P. Rudnev (May 19)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alex P. Rudnev (May 18)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alex P. Rudnev (May 18)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Nick Bastin (May 18)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Gary E. Miller (May 18)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Pete Kruckenberg (May 18)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Hank Nussbacher (May 18)