nanog mailing list archives
Re: transit across the ixs
From: Sanjay Dani <sanjay () professionals com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 14:58:59 -0800 (PST)
It sounds like Verio (a) didn't know about CIX's next-hop policy at PAIX and (b) is about to ask for it to be changed.cix? what's cix? some kind of sugared cereal?
Think it is a router that many months ago saw tons of traffic pass between 2914 and 701 :-) Just observing as a recreational shell customer of a 2914 subsidiary. Consequently (a) above may not (should not?) hold.
Current thread:
- Re: transit across the ixs, (continued)
- Re: transit across the ixs bmanning (Feb 14)
- Message not available
- Re: transit across the ixs Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 15)
- Re: transit across the ixs Alex Bligh (Feb 15)
- Re: transit across the ixs Paul Vixie (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Leo Bicknell (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Jared Mauch (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Paul A Vixie (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Randy Bush (Feb 17)