nanog mailing list archives
Re: transit across the ixs
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 10:00:14 -0800
cool beans. employment security for level-3s at the noc. makes it really fun to debug when packets come from places different where routes go. good job. --randy
It sounds like Verio (a) didn't know about CIX's next-hop policy at PAIX and (b) is about to ask for it to be changed. Any CIX member who wants to see the CIX router as the next-hop for all PAIX-reachable routes should just ask for that behaviour. After all it's not like the GIGAswitch has buffering limitations or HOL blocking or anything bad like that. The CIX router at PAIX has been called "like a route server" and except for the "1280" that gets put into transit paths, that's just about true. (There is just enough SMDS and private connection traffic to make it false, though.)
Current thread:
- Re: transit across the ixs, (continued)
- Re: transit across the ixs bmanning (Feb 14)
- Re: transit across the ixs Randy Bush (Feb 14)
- Re: transit across the ixs bmanning (Feb 14)
- Message not available
- Re: transit across the ixs Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 15)
- Re: transit across the ixs Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Leo Bicknell (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: transit across the ixs Jared Mauch (Feb 17)