nanog mailing list archives
Re: More on Y2K "glitches"....
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () virgin relcom eu net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 10:38:35 +0300 (MSK)
Hmm. I know at least the bill from one (honored) bank where it is written: annual percentage rate 290.79% :-O Billings, sir -:). On 29 Dec 1999, Sean Donelan wrote:
Date: 29 Dec 1999 13:16:36 -0800 From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> To: ferguson () cisco com Cc: vern () ee lbl gov, nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... On Wed, 29 December 1999, Paul Ferguson wrote:At 11:48 AM 12/29/1999 -0800, Vern Paxson wrote:http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,33324,00.htmlHmmmm, a pretty misleading article. The headline is "The Glitches Start Marching In", but it reports exactly one glitch, the one we already heard about, and then has a nine-bullet list that the headline makes you think will be additional glitches, but in fact is a list of precautionary measures various people have taken.True. :-)Ask and ye shall receive. Wired has changed the headline on the front page to read "Trying to Avoid the Glitches" although the headline on the article page is unchanged.
Aleksei Roudnev, (+1 415) 585-3489 /San Francisco CA/
Current thread:
- More on Y2K "glitches".... Paul Ferguson (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... scott w (Dec 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Vern Paxson (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Paul Ferguson (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 29)