nanog mailing list archives
Re: More on Y2K "glitches"....
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 29 Dec 1999 13:16:36 -0800
On Wed, 29 December 1999, Paul Ferguson wrote:
At 11:48 AM 12/29/1999 -0800, Vern Paxson wrote:http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,33324,00.htmlHmmmm, a pretty misleading article. The headline is "The Glitches Start Marching In", but it reports exactly one glitch, the one we already heard about, and then has a nine-bullet list that the headline makes you think will be additional glitches, but in fact is a list of precautionary measures various people have taken.True. :-)
Ask and ye shall receive. Wired has changed the headline on the front page to read "Trying to Avoid the Glitches" although the headline on the article page is unchanged.
Current thread:
- More on Y2K "glitches".... Paul Ferguson (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... scott w (Dec 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Vern Paxson (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Paul Ferguson (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: More on Y2K "glitches".... Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 29)