nanog mailing list archives
Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest?
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () mibh net>
Date: 22 Aug 1999 08:15:48 -0700
ekgermann () cctec com (Eric Germann) writes:
I think today most are a little too liberal with the term engineer. Those of us who went the traditional route of education and earned the title as an ME, EE or CE sometimes bristle that we're lumped in with the guy who just passed his CNE from the books.
hmmm. then, how do you feel about being lumped in with highschool dropouts who have no certification whatsoever? -- Paul Vixie <vixie () mibh net> >> But what *IS* the internet? > It's the largest equivalence class in the reflexive transitive > symmetric closure of the relationship "can be reached by an IP > packet from". --Seth Breidbart
Current thread:
- Re: Tech contact for Qwest?, (continued)
- Re: Tech contact for Qwest? Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: Tech contact for Qwest? Brett_Watson (Aug 20)
- Re: Tech contact for Qwest? Michael Heller (Aug 20)
- Re: Tech contact for Qwest? ravim (Aug 20)
- FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Chris Flores (Aug 20)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? fulton (Aug 21)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Charles Sprickman (Aug 21)
- RE: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Marcellus Smith (Aug 21)
- RE: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Eric Germann (Aug 22)
- Engineers for the better... Marcellus Smith (Aug 22)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Paul Vixie (Aug 22)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Nathan Stratton (Aug 22)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Paul A Vixie (Aug 22)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Mike Heller (Aug 22)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Henry R. Linneweh (Aug 22)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? fulton (Aug 21)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Richard Irving (Aug 22)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Alex P. Rudnev (Aug 23)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Dean Robb (Aug 24)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Dana Hudes (Aug 24)
- Re: FW: Tech contact for Qwest? Eric Germann (Aug 24)