nanog mailing list archives

Re: IRRs [was Re: OPS: BGP spew from ASN 7374]


From: Alex Bligh <amb () gxn net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 14:17:30 +0200



* Several people still peer via the route servers
* Several transits filter their customers by RADB or a private RADB
  which feeds the IRR.

Care to name names?

route servers: see http://www.rsng.net/ for a list

Transits - I did a survey on NANOG a few months ago as to who filtered
and how (both peers and customers). About 50% of those who replied
used RADB or another similar database (possibly their own, like
CA*NET, MCI/CW, Level3 etc.) for filtering either peers or customers.
However, I suspect this number is heavilly skewed in favour of vocal
NANOG people who like IRRs. Filtering customers was way more prevalent
than filtering peers.

I said I'd repost the stuff anonymously, but some contributors often
post here and thus may chose to answer your question on or off list.

Connectivity failures can and do result when RADB records are not
properly updated, which does happen from time to time. They also
happened when records WERE properly updated, but the changes made were
deemed "too radical" by the software translating the RADB entries into
internal databases. Moving a portable prefix from one ASN to another
qualified as "too radical" a change, despite it being a semi common
occurrence.

And various people had different solutions to this, the most common
being a sort of 2 of 3 approach (RADB change, plus sanity algorithm,
plus sanity person).
 
If you do either of the above, chaning a public IRR (once) is easier
than changing n private databases. The alternative is no filtering.
Hopefully natural selection will take its course on transits who
do this on a regular basis.

If common and consistent tools and rules were used to build filters from
a SINGLE public database, and if the database site listed contact
information and test addresses for each network using the database, I
think folks could live with that.

Well if they could agree on a routing policy language, that would be a
fine start.

-- 
Alex Bligh
GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)





Current thread: