nanog mailing list archives
RE: Severe Response Degradation
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:43:57 -0700
I have tried it, and forgotten about it, should have mentioned it. This works. The problem is that you need a node to traceroute to first. But y'all already have that <grin>.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Derek Balling Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 6:18 AM To: Derrick Bennett; 'nanog () merit edu' Subject: RE: Severe Response DegradationThis is what we are currently seeing. Unfortunately @Home does not do reverse dns for their routers so I am going by their helpdesk'sdescriptionsof locations. I do know that the router is in SF but could notget an exactlocation due to @home claiming it to be a sprint issue. This also brings back the conversation of RFC1918 addressing and the problems it can cause when troubleshooting response issues.I haven't actually tried this, but I have been told that if you actually use @Home's DNS servers and query the RFC1918 addresses for the routers, it will give you back "intelligent" names. All well and good for average-joe-weenie-@Home-user, but not very good for those of us not slaved to their DNS. :) D
Current thread:
- Re: Severe Response Degradation, (continued)
- Re: Severe Response Degradation Stephen Stuart (Apr 27)
- RE: Severe Response Degradation Derrick Bennett (Apr 27)
- RE: Severe Response Degradation Derek Balling (Apr 28)
- Re: Severe Response Degradation Daniel Senie (Apr 28)
- Re: Severe Response Degradation Andrew Brown (Apr 28)
- Re: Severe Response Degradation Jeff Aitken (Apr 28)
- Re: Severe Response Degradation Daniel Senie (Apr 28)
- Re: Severe Response Degradation Andrew Brown (Apr 28)
- Torrent Routers Darin Divinia (Apr 28)
- RE: Severe Response Degradation Derek Balling (Apr 28)
- Re: Severe Response Degradation Derek Balling (Apr 28)
- RE: Severe Response Degradation Roeland M.J. Meyer (Apr 28)