nanog mailing list archives

RE: Severe Response Degradation


From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:43:57 -0700


I have tried it, and forgotten about it, should have mentioned it. This works. The problem is that you need a node to 
traceroute to first. But y'all already have that <grin>.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Derek Balling
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 6:18 AM
To: Derrick Bennett; 'nanog () merit edu'
Subject: RE: Severe Response Degradation 




This is what we are currently seeing. Unfortunately @Home does not do
reverse dns for their routers so I am going by their helpdesk's 
descriptions
of locations. I do know that the router is in SF but could not 
get an exact
location due to @home claiming it to be a sprint issue. This also brings
back the conversation of RFC1918 addressing and the problems it can cause
when troubleshooting response issues.

I haven't actually tried this, but I have been told that if you actually 
use @Home's DNS servers and query the RFC1918 addresses for the 
routers, it 
will give you back "intelligent" names.

All well and good for average-joe-weenie-@Home-user, but not very 
good for 
those of us not slaved to their DNS. :)

D





Current thread: