nanog mailing list archives
Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad
From: Robert Szarka <szarka () downcity net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:43:02 -0400
At 11:22 AM 9/22/98 , you wrote:
For modem to modem communications, start and stop bits were used up through 2400 baud when one bit = one tone. The method of one bit = one tone was dropped for other forms of encoding when modems started supporting connection speeds in excess of 2400 baud.
I assume you mean 2400 bps modems, i.e., v.22bis? Admittedly, it's been a while since I used one, but my recollection is that 2400 bps modems operate at 600 baud, with 4 bits/baud using QAM.
All said, I still stand by my comment that 53 modems per T1 is ludicrous.
This, without a doubt, is true. :) -- Robert Szarka Managing Partner, Operations DownCity, LLC +1 860 823 3000
Current thread:
- And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Christian Nielsen (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Chris Cappuccio (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Richard Irving (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Jerry Scharf (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Paul Zawada (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad David Stoddard (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Miquel van Smoorenburg (Sep 21)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad David Stoddard (Sep 22)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad John Leong (Sep 22)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Robert Szarka (Sep 22)
- Message not available
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 23)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Paul Zawada (Sep 18)