nanog mailing list archives
Packetshaper Replacement
From: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonz () netrail net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 10:48:57 -0400 (EDT)
Hello, I'm curious if anyone knows of any good alternatives to shape bandwidth logically other than the packeteer. We're having persistent problems with slow bandwidth, including bandwidth outside any policy limitations, and for some reason it keeps kicking into safe mode as well. Ironically they were having the same problems on the interop demos =). I'm going to be taking a look at Foundry's Server-Iron which is a L4 switch, but it may not do what we need it to do. Bay networks makes some nice switches that are capable of bandwidth shaping, but only per physical port. Our basic needs are a unit that will shape logically, keep statistics, and all the general bells and whistles that one would need to maintain a shaped, shared-colo network. Thank you, Jonathan A. Zdziarski Senior Systems Administrator Netrail, inc. 888.NET.RAIL x240
Current thread:
- Packetshaper Replacement Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Oct 23)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Jeremy Greene (Oct 23)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Sanjay Dani (Oct 23)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Jeff Mcadams (Oct 23)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Sanjay Dani (Oct 23)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Jeff Mcadams (Oct 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Brett_Watson (Oct 25)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Randy Bush (Oct 25)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Jon Zeeff (Oct 26)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Oct 26)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Jeff Mcadams (Oct 26)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Brett_Watson (Oct 26)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Packetshaper Replacement Jeremy Greene (Oct 23)