nanog mailing list archives
RE: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers?
From: "Barry Raveendran Greene" <bgreene () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:30:21 +0800
Check the whitepaper at: http://www.cisco.com/public/cons/isp/documents/IOSEssentialsPDF.zip It's got some reverse-path and ingress/egress filtering write-ups. Barry
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Hui-Hui Hu Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 2:34 AM To: Phil Howard Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? it's a CC feature in the 11.1 train, it's been mentioned before, and should be applied per-interface. --- Tung-Hui Hu (HH26) 734.996.4911 http://arcfour.com : It doesn't seem to be working for me. What version of IOS does this new : feature show up in? Why hasn't it been mentioned before? Or is this not : similar enough to be usable to block smurf and other forgery? : Danny McPherson writes... : > Cisoc already has a feature similar to this, "ip verify unicast : > reverse-path".
Current thread:
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers?, (continued)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Jon Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Dalvenjah FoxFire (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Brian Dickson (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Danny McPherson (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 21)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Hui-Hui Hu (Oct 21)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Erik E. Fair (Oct 21)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 23)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Hui-Hui Hu (Oct 21)
- RE: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Barry Raveendran Greene (Oct 21)