nanog mailing list archives
Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers?
From: Phil Howard <phil () whistler intur net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 17:17:01 -0500 (CDT)
Danny McPherson writes...
ingress filtering .. that's a novel idea :-)
"smart" ingress filtering, as opposed to hard coded filtering, which is already done a lot. It would come at some costs, as every packet would have to have 2 routing lookups done for it, one of which must return or compare against all routes, not just the best route. -- -- *-----------------------------* Phil Howard KA9WGN * -- -- | Inturnet, Inc. | Director of Internet Services | -- -- | Business Internet Solutions | eng at intur.net | -- -- *-----------------------------* philh at intur.net * --
Current thread:
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers?, (continued)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 17)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Dan Hollis (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Dan Hollis (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Jon Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Dalvenjah FoxFire (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 19)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Hui-Hui Hu (Oct 21)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Erik E. Fair (Oct 21)
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Phil Howard (Oct 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Actions to quiet the Smurf amplifiers? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 23)