nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGPs in use
From: Danny McPherson <danny () genuity net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 19:59:36 -0700
This behavior is easily modified with route reflectors and/or confederations.
Although any other introduction of routing hierarchy is into the routing domain should be, well .. even more interesting. As Ben Black so eloquently noted earlier in the thread, "just because BGP is your hammer doesn't mean every problem is a nail". -danny
Current thread:
- Re: IGPs in use, (continued)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 13)
- Scaling Existing IGP Administration (was) Re: IGPs in use Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Randy Bush (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Henk Smit (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Re: IGPs in use Henk Smit (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use I Am Not An Isp (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Paul G. Donner (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Forrest W. Christian (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Jerry Scharf (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Henk Smit (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 14)