nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGPs in use
From: "Paul G. Donner" <pdonner () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 22:47:56 -0400
At 07:12 PM 10/13/98 -0700, Danny McPherson wrote:
How does this affect the hierarchy of the network since all iBGP speakers must be fully meshed?It'd all have to be flat... Recall the BGP rule: one iBGP speaker mustn't advertise routes to another iBGP speaker if they
were
learned from a third iBGP speaker. I'd be interested in hearing from anyone that *really* operates a network of more than a few routers and is using iBGP as an IGP .. if you can find the time to send me an email :-)
Good to see someone understood the point. ;-) -Donner
-danny
Current thread:
- Re: IGPs in use, (continued)
- Re: IGPs in use Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 13)
- Scaling Existing IGP Administration (was) Re: IGPs in use Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Randy Bush (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Henk Smit (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Re: IGPs in use Henk Smit (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use I Am Not An Isp (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Paul G. Donner (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Forrest W. Christian (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Jerry Scharf (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Henk Smit (Oct 14)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 14)