nanog mailing list archives

Re: IGPs in use

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:55:10 -0700 (PDT)

instead of descending into a silly syntax discussion of whether ibgp is an
egp or an igp, perhaps the guy would like an answer to his question.

most large nsps use is-is, but usually only to carry the routes of the bgp
speaking interfaces.

randy

Current thread:

IGPs in use Andre' Zehl (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Timothy R. McKee (Oct 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IGPs in use Megatron (Oct 12)
  - Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 12)
    - Re: IGPs in use Randy Bush (Oct 12)
    - Re: IGPs in use David O'Leary (Oct 12)
    - Re: IGPs in use Phillip Vandry (Oct 13)
    - Re: IGPs in use Jared Mauch (Oct 13)
    - Re: IGPs in use Alex Bligh (Oct 13)
    - Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 13)
    - Re: IGPs in use Ben Black (Oct 12)
    - Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 13)
    - Re: IGPs in use Paul G. Donner (Oct 13)
    - BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Chrisy Luke (Oct 13)
    - RE: IGPs in use Thom Youngblood (Oct 13)

(Thread continues...)