nanog mailing list archives
Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cp net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 11:06:37 -0800
On 11/17/98, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
I think you see where I'm going with this. How far does a business relationship extend?
We'd probably have to wait for a judge to decide. -- J.D. Falk <jdfalk () cp net> "Nathan says hi." Special Agent In Charge (Abuse Issues) Critical Path, Inc.
Current thread:
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited, (continued)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Dean Robb (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Ron_Johnson (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul A Vixie (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Dean Robb (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Karl Denninger (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Tim Pozar (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul A Vixie (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Dean Robb (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Steven J. Sobol (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Leo Bicknell (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited J.D. Falk (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul A Vixie (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited melinda b. thompson (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Sarah Baker (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul Vixie (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Jared Mauch (Nov 17)
- RE: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Chris Woodfield (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Rodney Joffe (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Steven J. Sobol (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Mike Reno (Nov 16)